Moralization Through Moral Shock
نویسندگان
چکیده
The current research tested whether exposure to disgusting images increases moral conviction and whether this happens in the presence of incidental disgust cues versus disgust cues relevant to the target of moralization. Across two studies, we exposed participants to one of the four sets of disgusting versus control images to test the moralization of abortion attitudes: pictures of aborted fetuses, animal abuse, non-harm related disgusting images, harm related disgusting images, or neutral pictures, at either subor supraliminal levels of awareness. Moral conviction about abortion increased (compared with control) only for participants exposed to abortion-related images at speeds slow enough to allow conscious awareness. Study 2 replicated this finding, and found that the relationship between attitudinally relevant disgust and moral conviction was mediated by disgust, and not anger or harm appraisals. Findings are discussed in terms of their relevance for intuitionist theories of morality and moral theories that emphasize harm.
منابع مشابه
MORALIZATION AND BECOMING A VEGETARIAN: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into values, and in doing so influences cross-generational transmission (because values are passed more effectively in families than are preferences), increases the likelihood of intemalization, invokes gr...
متن کاملRUNNING HEAD: MORALIZATION IN CHILDHOOD The Impact of Testimony on Children’s Moralization of Novel Actions
What leads children to moralize actions that cause no apparent harm? We hypothesized that adults’ verbal instruction (“testimony”), as well as emotions such as disgust, would influence children’s moralization of apparently harmless actions. To test this hypothesis, seven-year-old children were asked to render moral judgments of novel, seemingly victimless, body-directed or nature-directed actio...
متن کاملConsequentialist justifications and moralization 1 Running head: CONSEQUENTIALISM APPEARS LESS MORALIZED Core Values vs. Common Sense: Consequentialist Views Appear Less Rooted in Morality
When a speaker presents an opinion, an important factor in audiences’ reactions is whether the speaker seems to be basing her decision on ethical (as opposed to more pragmatic) concerns. We argue that, despite a consequentialist philosophical tradition that views utilitarian consequences as the basis for moral reasoning, lay perceivers think that speakers using arguments based on consequences d...
متن کاملIndividual Differences in the Moralization of Everyday Life
We report on the development and initial validation of the Moralization of Everyday Life Scale (MELS), designed to measure variations in people’s assignment of moral weight to commonplace behaviors. In Study 1, participants reported their judgments for a large number of potential moral infractions in everyday life; principal components analysis revealed 6 main dimensions of these judgments. In ...
متن کاملThe impact of testimony on children's moralization of novel actions.
What leads children to moralize actions that cause no apparent harm? We hypothesized that adults' verbal instruction ("testimony"), as well as emotions such as disgust, would influence children's moralization of apparently harmless actions. To test this hypothesis, 7-year-old children were asked to render moral judgments of novel, seemingly victimless, body-directed or nature-directed actions a...
متن کامل